#Medieval cue splitter vs plus

Now that I'm pretty sure what I want for info, I'm ready to tackle the splits again. but the good part is, if I want to change info I can do that pretty easy. Will take about 1 min to do split if I don't change any info. but found this program called Medieval Cue-Splitter Īnd now that I know what problem areas to look for, (spent the latter part of this day checking it out), I think it works. Was going to give up on the cue files for the multi wavs. on the wav itself :/ crymeariver.Been going at this off and on for 3 days now wtf omfg, it cuts off the first few seconds of the song. course I didn't notice until I was most of the way through ripping.So, I tried using EAC 'Multiple wavs with corrected gaps' yea, I thought, the cue file looks right and on first play, it played. Also tried using daemon tools, my single wav/cue, but it gave the same problem. spent way to much time editing the cues and gave up thinking had to be a better way. but this most of the time doesn't work and gives a cue file that doubles songs, leaves songs off, or.

#Medieval cue splitter vs plus

I've been going through hell trying to create multi song files PLUS a cue file for them too, (if I was just trying to get the song wav files it would be no problem).įirst off I tried using cue splitter from EAC or creating cue files with Use Current Gap settings. I think it's the safest way to have the orginal cd info on file (gap settings, title info.) But, No matter what, at this point, I'm keeping these single album wav files plus cue files as backup. you all know I've been working on splitting my single wav plus cue files into individual song wav files. i've redone my Folk collection ~ 100 gigs, about 3 times now. but I think? it's a happy story in the end. It is really the intelligence of the playback what should cause all to be without anomalies If not properly done in a current version (whatever player). removing gaps at ripping, will not get them back at playback when they should be there. what you cut out, can never be gotten back. Note that the latter is related, and is adding additional complications.ĭave, it is the same as with the 'cue file theory'. This might be about missing a few to several hundreds of samples between tracks, to missing 30ms or so at the end of a track. Please note that this is rather more complicated than it seems at first sight, and that I spent several 10ts of hours improving things to 100% opposed to the 'too simple' version 0.9g. I really don't know about 'leaving the gaps in' or 'removing the gaps' options of EAC, but removing them will never bring them back when they should be in. Per the current 0.9h version 100% decent gapless should be available The latter would be about some means of compression (like FLAC ?), and personally I did not try it. What do you think?Īlso, Do you think this is giving me the same files as I would get ripping the CD using: Copy Selected Tracks > Uncompressed ? My main question is - What option should I use? So far I've assummed 'With Gaps'.

I've never worried about what GAPS really were because it was all done with a single button push.

This splits the big single wav into individual song wavs (and also creates a new cue file for them my backups are still single wav/cue files until I'm sure what I'm doing).ĮAC > Tools (tab at top of eac) > Spilt WAV By CUE Sheet > (and then several options) With Gaps With Gaps Corrected Leave Out Gaps Individual Indices This rips the cd into one big single wav file and a cue file that holds all the title, timings.īecause XXHE is more geared toward individual song wav files, I've begun using EACs CUE splitter. I've ripped my CDs using EAC and the IMG button on the left hand side of EAC. Exact Audio Copy and its CUE Splitter question